Re: use of w3c logo, did-doge

čt 4. 5. 2023 v 4:40 odesílatel Wayne Chang <wayne@spruceid.com> napsal:

> Hi all, here is a Wikipedia link to the definition of a derivative work.
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_work
>
> If anyone seeks to contend that the image in question is not a derivative
> work and/or causes harm, please let me know and we can go from there.
>

I believe associating the W3C logo with Dogecoin could have a negative
impact on this group, as Dogecoin has a less than favorable reputation.

>
>
> Best,
> - Wayne
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 09:03 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:57 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> napsal:
>>
>>> That method spec is hosted on another organization's GitHub and is not
>>> to my knowledge a CCG work item
>>>
>>
>> It was on the official agenda of the CCG telecon:
>>
>> "Mike Prorock will share his famous Verifiable Credential for his rooster
>> and Wayne Chang will share DID dogecoin"
>>
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2021May/0167.html
>>
>> At a minimum it has been promoted here, by the previous chair, and
>> continues to feature, and be part of discussions, including yesterday on
>> the mailing list.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Mike Prorock
>>> mesur.io
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:52 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:39 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>
>>>> napsal:
>>>>
>>>>> Regular W3C logo unaltered is fine as long as it is on a community
>>>>> group draft respec template, or used in a manner that lines up with the
>>>>> usage link I sent.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.  I am using respec.  It looks like if you remove the logo
>>>> field altogether, by default, the W3C logo appears.  So I've done that.
>>>>
>>>> What about the use of the "W3D" (D=Doge) logo in this group?  It is
>>>> concerning.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Prorock
>>>>> mesur.io
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:30 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:27 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>
>>>>>> napsal:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chair hat on... I would put this squarely in the frowned upon area -
>>>>>>> obviously check with legal on your side.  See:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/logo-usage-20000308#faq-logo-change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does "frowned upon" mean (chair hat on)?  This was done by the
>>>>>> previous chair, wasnt it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My personal question is whether I can put the regular w3c logo on a
>>>>>> did method draft that I am working on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike Prorock
>>>>>>> mesur.io
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 02:46 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I noticed in the previous that the w3c logo was altered, with the
>>>>>>>> "c" changed to a "d" for doge
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://spruceid.github.io/did-doge/docs/w3d.png
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of creating a did draft, and I was wondering to
>>>>>>>> what extent the w3c logo can be reused, an in which context
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can w3c logo be used in community group drafts, or must it first be
>>>>>>>> in the registry?  Can it be altered etc?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>