Re: use of w3c logo, did-doge

st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:39 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> napsal:

> Regular W3C logo unaltered is fine as long as it is on a community group
> draft respec template, or used in a manner that lines up with the usage
> link I sent.
>

Thank you.  I am using respec.  It looks like if you remove the logo field
altogether, by default, the W3C logo appears.  So I've done that.

What about the use of the "W3D" (D=Doge) logo in this group?  It is
concerning.


>
> Mike Prorock
> mesur.io
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:30 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:27 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> napsal:
>>
>>> Chair hat on... I would put this squarely in the frowned upon area -
>>> obviously check with legal on your side.  See:
>>> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/logo-usage-20000308#faq-logo-change
>>>
>>
>> What does "frowned upon" mean (chair hat on)?  This was done by the
>> previous chair, wasnt it?
>>
>> My personal question is whether I can put the regular w3c logo on a did
>> method draft that I am working on.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mike Prorock
>>> mesur.io
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 02:46 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I noticed in the previous that the w3c logo was altered, with the "c"
>>>> changed to a "d" for doge
>>>>
>>>> https://spruceid.github.io/did-doge/docs/w3d.png
>>>>
>>>> I'm in the process of creating a did draft, and I was wondering to what
>>>> extent the w3c logo can be reused, an in which context
>>>>
>>>> Can w3c logo be used in community group drafts, or must it first be in
>>>> the registry?  Can it be altered etc?
>>>>
>>>