Re: use of w3c logo, did-doge

Regular W3C logo unaltered is fine as long as it is on a community group
draft respec template, or used in a manner that lines up with the usage
link I sent.

Mike Prorock
mesur.io

On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:30 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:27 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> napsal:
>
>> Chair hat on... I would put this squarely in the frowned upon area -
>> obviously check with legal on your side.  See:
>> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/logo-usage-20000308#faq-logo-change
>>
>
> What does "frowned upon" mean (chair hat on)?  This was done by the
> previous chair, wasnt it?
>
> My personal question is whether I can put the regular w3c logo on a did
> method draft that I am working on.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Mike Prorock
>> mesur.io
>>
>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 02:46 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed in the previous that the w3c logo was altered, with the "c"
>>> changed to a "d" for doge
>>>
>>> https://spruceid.github.io/did-doge/docs/w3d.png
>>>
>>> I'm in the process of creating a did draft, and I was wondering to what
>>> extent the w3c logo can be reused, an in which context
>>>
>>> Can w3c logo be used in community group drafts, or must it first be in
>>> the registry?  Can it be altered etc?
>>>
>>