- From: Moses Ma <moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 17:23:24 -0800
- To: "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Cc: Doc Searls <doc@searls.com>, Joyce Searls <joyce@searls.com>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Drummond Reed <Drummond.Reed@gendigital.com>
- Message-ID: <4b96d39c-e3c3-0047-f66e-cf944952a971@futurelabconsulting.com>
Wow, Drummond, this is really interesting. I'll dig into this, thanks! On 2/12/23 1:21 PM, Drummond Reed wrote: > > David, great points, I agree completely. In the offline world, one > legal recourse that has (sometimes) helped individual consumers “level > the playing field” with large companies (and their vastly superior > legal resources) is class action lawsuits > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_action>. > > What is coming with the emergence of decentralized identity wallets > and agents is a different kind of reverse leverage: large-scale > *consumer-driven governance frameworks* (aka trust frameworks). Rather > than wait until harm has happened, these governance frameworks can > specify the terms that a large group of consumers have collectively > decided are fair, and then market forces can help convince large > companies to agree to operate under those terms. > > This is work Doc and Joyce Searls have been leading at Customer > Commons <https://customercommons.org/> for years. With decentralized > identity, we may finally be in striking distance of realizing their > vision. > > =Drummond > > *From: *David Booth <david@dbooth.org> > *Date: *Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:01 PM > *To: *public-credentials@w3.org <public-credentials@w3.org> > *Subject: *[EXT] Re: Seeking some info > > On 2/12/23 14:10, Bob Wyman wrote: > > . . . > > Current law, in many jurisdictions, now protects individuals from > > government abridgement of rights. But those same laws usually don't > > protect us from abridgements which result from contractual > > relationships between individuals and corporations. > > Agreed, and people are so conditioned to mindlessly accept ridiculously > long click-through agreements, that companies could easily have people > signing away their entire digital identities without knowing it. > > Case in point: Last I looked, indeed.com's click-through agreement was a > whopping 100 pages!!! At an average of $300/hour for an attorney, it > would cost a consumer thousands of dollars just to have it reviewed. > > Big companies and consumers do NOT have equal bargaining power in > negotiating these click-through agreements. The "free market" doesn't > work when the parties do not have equal bargaining power. That's why we > have anti-trust laws to regulate monopolies, and why we need similar > laws regarding click-through agreements. > > David Booth > -- *Moses Ma | Managing Partner* moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com | moses@ngenven.com v+1.415.568.1068 | allmylinks.com/moses-ma Learn more at www.futurelabconsulting.com. For calendar invites, please cc: mosesma@gmail.com
Received on Monday, 13 February 2023 01:23:45 UTC