Kim, Web 7.0 and the InterCredential ARM are heavily publicized on Twitter and LinkedIn. Checkout:
* https://twitter.com/search?q=%23web7
* https://twitter.com/search?q=%23intercredential
* https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?keywords=%23web7&sid=%2C%40E
* https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?keywords=%23intercredential&sid=%3B07
Best regards,
Michael Herman
Web 7.0
From: Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2023 1:12 PM
To: Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>; public-credentials@w3.org; Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>; Daniel Hardman (daniel.hardman@gmail.com) <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>; G. Ken Holman (g.ken.holman@gmail.com) <g.ken.holman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Layering/Composability of Verifiable Credentials (was: Re: Market Adoption of VCs by Fortune 500s (was: Re: DHS Verifier Confidence/Assurance Level Expectation/Treatment of non-publicly defined Vocabulary/Terminology -- by using @vocab))
I searched for InterCredential spec but couldn't find it. I found this web 7.0 reference but it's not clear it's what you're talking about: https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3184558.3190666
Pointers to specs please?
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 10:56 AM Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <mwherman@parallelspace.net<mailto:mwherman@parallelspace.net>> wrote:
Rather than engage in endless debate, it's easier/more expedient to embrace, by reference, the W3C VC2 specification as a sub-specification of the InterCredential spec ...an embrace-and-extend model ...and let the decentralized systems developer marketplace decide.
After the inclusion of the 4-Corner Credential Interoperability Model into the InterCredential ARM, the W3C VC2 spec becomes a niche layer/specification. See the green box in the diagram below.
Michael Herman
Web 7.0
[cid:image001.jpg@01D93A05.B29AD7C0]
-----Original Message-----
From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com<mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>>
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2023 11:46 AM
To: public-credentials@w3.org<mailto:public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Layering/Composability of Verifiable Credentials (was: Re: Market Adoption of VCs by Fortune 500s (was: Re: DHS Verifier Confidence/Assurance Level Expectation/Treatment of non-publicly defined Vocabulary/Terminology -- by using @vocab))
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 4:58 PM Nate Otto <nate@ottonomy.net<mailto:nate@ottonomy.net>> wrote:
> Cheers! I hope you have a good time in the community people here have spent the last decade building, and I hope you find great collaborators for the pieces of credentials-related work you want to contribute to.
Thank you, Nate -- that was wonderfully written! I found myself nodding in agreement as I read through your response.
Michael, does Nate get it? He seems to have addressed all of your questions/statements?
-- manu
--
Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
