Re: Need co-sponsor for Verifiable Credential Refresh 2021

Thanks Manu.

After reviewing the work done by you and team so far, there is enough
overlap with some of our inspection use cases that I would like to
volunteer to co-sponsor as a work item for CCG

Mike Prorock
mesur.io

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, 20:51 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> On 12/5/21 6:19 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> > https://digitalbazaar.github.io/vc-refresh-2021/
> >
> > We expect to suggest adopting this as a work item in early 2022.
>
> It's that time... :)
>
> This work item was discussed in this week's VC API call. We did an
> introduction that you can read about here:
>
> https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/2022-01-11-vcapi/#topic-3
>
> General vibes for the spec seemed positive (as measured by the CCG
> vibe-ometer).
>
> We're looking for a co-sponsor for the specification. Expected workload
> for a co-editor on the spec is expected to be fairly light since it
> re-uses large chunks of the VC API and VP Request spec.
>
> Are you interested in co-sponsoring the Verifiable Credential Refresh
> 2021 specification as a CCG work item?
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> Our Verifiable Credential Deployments
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/case-studies
>
>

Received on Thursday, 13 January 2022 12:33:27 UTC