- From: Harrison <harrison@spokeo.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 08:39:35 -0800
- To: Daniel Buchner <dbuchner@tbd.email>
- Cc: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>, ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net>, Kaliya Identity Woman <kaliya@identitywoman.net>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFYh=42hz-UCELKv4NA56fHv8zne05XDJ88cZd-CdhROr4bW+A@mail.gmail.com>
We've invited Kaliya to present and lead the discussion on this topic of "SB786 - CA Vital Records in Verifiable Credentials" on *2/7/2023*. You can see the latest W3C CCG calendar here: https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/credentials/calendar. Sincerely, Harrison On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:33 PM Daniel Buchner <dbuchner@tbd.email> wrote: > I heard rumors they're going to solve async issuance by emailing PDFs of > creds, and that you can build decentralized apps with the by storing app > data in mDocs. Super bullish, this approach is very highly regarded. > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, 10:25 PM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> > wrote: > >> mDoc does not use JWTs, CWTs or OIDC either right? >> >> But they do use COSE and x509? >> >> How can they survive without an IANA registry... Must be some fancy magic. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, 10:18 PM ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net> >> wrote: >> >>> I have only commented on the ISO specifications and what they currently >>> use, I made no assessment of the technology. The ISO specifications don't >>> currently the use W3C DID specification or the W3C VC specification. >>> >>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net> >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 9, 2022 2:14:19 PM >>> *To:* Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>; Kaliya Identity Woman < >>> kaliya@identitywoman.net> >>> *Cc:* Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> >>> *Subject:* Re: California - Verifiable Credentials >>> >>> mdoc is just the format of the document/credential which is currently >>> encoded in cbor structures. >>> >>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 9, 2022 2:04:05 PM >>> *To:* Kaliya Identity Woman <kaliya@identitywoman.net> >>> *Cc:* ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net>; Credentials Community >>> Group <public-credentials@w3.org> >>> *Subject:* Re: California - Verifiable Credentials >>> >>> mDoc is called Apple ID now right? >>> >>> Wonder why they didn't go with Bitcoin and JSON Web Tokens. >>> >>> Probably because of how unsustainable base64url encoding is. >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, 9:26 PM Kaliya Identity Woman < >>> kaliya@identitywoman.net> wrote: >>> >>> They do mention DIDs right Tony? >>> >>> and then right after that "Verifiable digital identity credentialing" >>> >>> "An additional standard, Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0 is >>> emerging as an alternative for verifiable digital identity >>> credentialing. >>> >>> The proposed solution should adhere to these defined standards" >>> >>> >>> So it doesn't sound to me like it is ONLY about mDLs and mDocs >>> >>> >>> And sure enough...when I got the link >>> <https://sam.gov/opp/5999b677ac2f485997560355643bf7fa/view> from Steve >>> and checked....voila - the VC data model is in the references :) >>> >>> >>> REFERENCES: >>> >>> NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Guideline for the National >>> Qualification System >>> >>> https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/fema_nims_nqs_guideline_0.pdf >>> >>> >>> ISO/IEC 18013-5:2021 Personal identification — ISO-compliant driving >>> license — Part 5: Mobile driving license (mDL) application >>> https://www.iso.org/standard/69084.html >>> >>> Cards and security devices for personal identification — Building blocks >>> for identity management via mobile devices — Part 1: Generic system >>> architectures of mobile eID systems >>> https://www.iso.org/standard/74910.html >>> >>> Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0 Core architecture, data model, and >>> representations. >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/ >>> Verifiable Credentials Data Model v1.1. >>> https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/ >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 7:13 PM ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> The ISO specs that are mentioned by Steve in how post are not W3C VC >>> based they are mdoc these are with the digital driver's license is based >>> upon. >>> >>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Kaliya Identity Woman <kaliya@identitywoman.net> >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 9, 2022 12:55:38 PM >>> *To:* ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net> >>> *Cc:* Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> >>> *Subject:* Re: California - Verifiable Credentials >>> >>> I'm saying that what Steve was sharing mentioned DIDs and implied VCs. >>> You seem very sure they were not referring to our specifications but I >>> think they are. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 6:46 PM ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I made made no assumptions, I did not say anything about what >>> governments are looking at, I'm stating what the ISO specs are built up on >>> and what the digital drivers licenses pilots are currently using. >>> >>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Kaliya Identity Woman <kaliya@identitywoman.net> >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 9, 2022 12:38:19 PM >>> *To:* ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net> >>> *Cc:* Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> >>> *Subject:* Re: California - Verifiable Credentials >>> >>> They mention DIDs. >>> >>> So lets see if our friend Steve can ask them what they mean in that >>> SBIR. >>> >>> You are making a lot of assumptions that Governments are not looking at >>> and interested in using VCs or having alignment between the two >>> standards that have very different starting points. Neither of which is a >>> complete end-to-end solution as Lucy and I discerned in our latest work. >>> >>> VC <> mDL Project Stakeholder Interviews >>> <https://medium.com/@identitywoman-in-business/vc-mdl-project-stakeholder-interviews-6d175da09598> >>> >>> Where can the W3C VCs meet the ISO 18013–5 mDL? >>> <https://medium.com/@identitywoman-in-business/where-can-the-w3c-vcs-meet-the-iso-18013-5-mdl-b2d450bb19f8>An >>> open letter to the two standards communities as well as all interested >>> parties >>> >>> The EU put lots of government funding into VC projects via ESSIF Lab and >>> EBSI and I was just in Brussels for the wrap up of ESSIF-Lab. >>> >>> - Kaliya >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 6:19 PM ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I participate in defining and implementing the ISO 22320 series and >>> 18013-5, these are mdoc based not W3C VC based at this time. The mdoc >>> credential is also called a "verifiable credential". >>> >>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Kaliya Identity Woman <kaliya@identitywoman.net> >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 9, 2022 12:12:18 PM >>> *To:* nadalin@prodigy.net <nadalin@prodigy.net> >>> *Cc:* Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> >>> *Subject:* Re: California - Verifiable Credentials >>> >>> Sigh. >>> Really - and how do you know what it does or doesn't refer to. >>> >>> Given that USCIS will be issuing Verifiable Credentials for Green Cards >>> in the coming months. >>> I think a wallet that aligns with these standards would be a good idea. >>> >>> I am guessing that this dual holding and use of both standards in a >>> wallet is what it is referring to. >>> >>> - Kaliya >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:32 PM <nadalin@prodigy.net> wrote: >>> >>> I don’t think that the term “verifiable credentials” relative to drivers >>> licenses has any reference to the W3C VC as this term is overloaded. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Kaliya Identity Woman <kaliya@identitywoman.net> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 8, 2022 4:11 PM >>> *To:* Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> >>> *Subject:* California - Verifiable Credentials >>> >>> >>> >>> HI CCG, >>> >>> >>> >>> I wanted to share more good news for California related to Verifiable >>> Credentials in a report from the Governor called Towards Responsible >>> Innovation >>> <https://business.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/TowardsResponsibleInnovation_221202.pdf> >>> . >>> >>> >>> >>> Page 1 >>> >>> • Government Services and Verifiable Credentials >>> >>> Page 23 >>> >>> DMV Verifiable Credentials >>> >>> The DMV is also exploring improvements to state-issued credentials. >>> Potential use cases include taking existing forms, placards, licenses, or >>> other physical products issued by the DMV, and enhancing and/or reinventing >>> them by adding blockchain-based forms of fraud prevention. Digital >>> signatures and other verification procedures could be used to ensure that >>> issuing and tracking these types of products is safer and more efficient. >>> In late 2022 and early 2023, the DMV anticipates proving the utility of >>> these use cases by piloting new disabled placards, new credentials for >>> tracking driver safety courses, and driver’s licenses. >>> >>> page 27 >>> >>> Explore and develop more government use cases. >>> >>> The public sector may be able to utilize blockchain technology to >>> increase efficiencies, improve access to services, and reduce costs. • >>> GovOps will continue working with state agencies and other levels of >>> government to identify and promote blockchain pilot programs, similar to >>> those now underway at the DMV. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *State of California Releases Interagency Web3, Crypto Asset and >>> Blockchain Progress Report * >>> >>> >>> >>> In May 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-9-22 >>> <https://business.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=3da1cf062778afecadd465143&id=05490a31b3&e=8953aa4fe7> to >>> ensure California engages early and proactively with this nascent industry >>> with the goal of ensuring continued consumer protections, innovation, job >>> growth, advancing equity and regulatory clarity, among other strategic >>> outcomes. >>> >>> This interagency blockchain progress report >>> <https://business.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=3da1cf062778afecadd465143&id=c4150ebdd3&e=8953aa4fe7> - >>> authored by the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development, the >>> Business Consumer Services and Housing Agency, the Department of Financial >>> Protection and Innovation and the Government Operations Agency - reflects >>> the administration's work to implement the executive order over the last >>> seven months, beginning with stakeholder meetings that took place over the >>> summer. >>> >>> Additional administration activities included the advancement of public >>> use cases, and progress towards regulatory clarity. This foundation of work >>> has positioned California to accomplish the goals set forth in the >>> Executive Order and to realize the opportunities blockchain technologies >>> provide to our residents. >>> >>> -- *Harrison Tang* CEO <https://www.linkedin.com/in/theceodad/>LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/theceodad/> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/theceodad/> • <https://twitter.com/TheCEODad>Twitter <https://twitter.com/TheCEODad> • <https://www.tiktok.com/@tang_toks> Tiktok <https://www.tiktok.com/@tang_toks> • <https://www.facebook.com/TheCEODad> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/TheCEODad/>
Received on Sunday, 11 December 2022 16:40:08 UTC