- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 12:53:51 -0400
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 4/14/22 11:06 AM, Heather Vescent wrote: > OK, if it was covered with a previous work item, yes that makes sense to > transfer it all over - no need to do another work item. Acknowledged, thanks! > Aside: we need to find a better way to organize CCG repos per work item, so > LMK if you have any ideas. We currently have 98 repositories under CCG... perhaps we could use the "Topics" feature in Github to mark each repository with a specific work item tag. Like the 10-ish repositories associated with VC-API spec, use cases, and testing would all be tagged with "vc-api". All the repos associated w/ the VC EDU work would be tagged with "vc-edu"... Traceability would be tagged with "traceability", and so on. We could then create a web page on the CCG website that retrieves the Github repository list and categorizes all repos into sections of a page under "VC API", "VC EDU", "Traceability", etc. That would mean that the Chairs/Community no longer needs to manually update this file: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/blob/master/work_items.md -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2022 16:54:07 UTC