Re: Migrating supporting repositories to CCG?

OK, if it was covered with a previous work item, yes that makes sense to
transfer it all over - no need to do another work item. That was not clear
in your original ask. For anything that isn't already supporting an
approved work item, you should do a new work item. This should just be
"paperwork," but you know how important it is to follow our processes.

Aside: we need to find a better way to organize CCG repos per work item, so
LMK if you have any ideas.

-H

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:38 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> On 4/14/22 10:10 AM, Heather Vescent wrote:
> > So I suggest the path forward is to: create a single work item that
> > satisfies the work item requirements, and put all those repos under that
> > work item.
>
> Yes, agree that that should be the general rule.
>
> Regarding my specific ask, for the majority of the list that I provided,
> that
> Work Item was the VC API.
>
> Let me try and draw a more direct line from the items I listed (test
> suites)
> to their pre-existing CCG work items (CCG specs):
>
> * Implementations -> VC API Work Item
> * Assertion libraries -> VC API Work Item and Data
>   Integrity Work Items
> * Basic VC Issuer API -> VC API Work Item
> * Basic VC Verifier API -> VC API Work Item
> * Cryptosuites -> Data Integrity Work Items
> * Basic Presentation Exchange -> VC API Work Item
> * Credential Refresh 2021 -> Credential Refresh 2021 Work
>    Item
> * Industry Vertical VCs
>     * Permanent Resident Card -> Citizenship Vocabulary
>       Work Item
>     * Student ID, Skill, Transcript tests -> No current
>       Work Items
>
> Everything but the last bullet point has an existing associated CCG work
> item.
> For the last bullet point, we don't have any test suite covering those
> things
> yet, so I would expect /someone/ to put those items through the standard
> work
> item process.
>
> All that said, my read on what both you and MikeP are saying is that we can
> move all the items that are already associated with existing work items
> over
> immediately. Everything else (Student ID, Skill, Transcript) will need to
> go
> through the work item process.
>
> Does the above make sense?
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021)
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
>
>
>

-- 
Heather Vescent <http://www.heathervescent.com/>
Co-Chair, Credentials Community Group @W3C
<https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/>
President, The Purple Tornado, Inc <https://thepurpletornado.com/>
Author, The Secret of Spies <https://amzn.to/2GfJpXH>
Author, The Cyber Attack Survival Manual
<https://www.amazon.com/Cyber-Attack-Survival-Manual-Apocalypse/dp/1681886545/>
Author, A Comprehensive Guide to Self Sovereign Identity
<https://ssiscoop.com/>

@heathervescent <https://twitter.com/heathervescent> | Film Futures
<https://vimeo.com/heathervescent> | Medium
<https://medium.com/@heathervescent/> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/heathervescent/> | Future of Security Updates
<https://app.convertkit.com/landing_pages/325779/>