Three questions for Chris and our group related to real-word challenges to SSI progress: W1 - Is the Wyoming process concerned only about the identity and authority of natural persons and, if so, does the need for "efficiency" in cases where an identity is about a role or a thing introduce confusion into our work products? W2 - How would the Wyoming process apply to biometrics as a component of identity? See https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/211 for a few specifics. W3 - When authority over identity maps into authority over a verifiable credential, would the Wyoming process deal with request and authorization protocols differently as applied to the Issuer vs the Holder of the VC? - Adrian On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:16 PM Christopher Allen < ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:25 PM Alan Karp <alanhkarp@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Delegating an identity doesn't connote that it's limited. >> > > There is nothing in what is in the current law or those proposed that says > you delegate your whole identity, but instead that you have as a natural > person the Principal Authority around your digital self that can be the > foundation of various rights. > > For instance, when I delegate decisions abou certain assets to a financial > advisor, I don’t give them rights over all my assets. But the assets I do > delegate to them decisions about, the decisions that my financial advisor > makes must benefit me. The can’t consider their personal benefit. > > — Christopher Allen > >>Received on Thursday, 16 September 2021 22:29:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:25:22 UTC