I sympathize with Mozilla's comments about centralized methods and proof-of-work methods, and I believe these concerns could be addressed in the DID Rubric and DID Implementation Guide documents, without necessarily requiring changes to DID Core itself. Mozilla's other comment about lack of interoperability is however hard to unterstand for me. The whole point of DID methods is to ENABLE interoperability between heterogeneous identifier systems. Some use cases will only use a single DID method and not be interoperable with others. Some DID methods will become very popular and be widely interoperable across many different systems. Some DID methods may become standardized (e.g. did:key, did:web) and therefore "effectively mandatory". Some use cases will want to support as many DID methods as possible, even less popular ones. This flexibility is a feature, not a bug. Markus On 02.09.21 04:11, Orie Steele wrote: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2021Sep/0000.html > <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2021Sep/0000.html> > > The objection mentions comments from Google and Microsoft, but does > not link directly to them. > > Does anyone have a direct link to the comments from Google and Microsoft? > > OS > > -- > *ORIE STEELE* > Chief Technical Officer > www.transmute.industries > > <https://www.transmute.industries>Received on Thursday, 2 September 2021 07:32:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:25:22 UTC