- From: Steve Capell <steve.capell@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:45:06 +1000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
Isn’t it true that pretty much every VC that is about a “thing” (eg an invoice about a shipment , a bill of lading about a consignment, an origin certificate about a product , etc) are bearer VCs because the verifier only cares about proof of issuer ID. the ID of the thing (subject) isn’t something that the thing has to (or is able to) prove. It’s just an assertion by the issuer These “esoteric” cases represent 99% of my use cases and volumes Steven Capell Mob: 0410 437854 > On 9 Jun 2021, at 6:02 am, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 6/6/21 5:57 PM, Kerri Lemoie wrote: >> I’m not clear on the uses for the optional id in the vc assertion. It >> would be helpful to learn about some examples or suggested uses. > > I saw answers for why you wouldn't want to use an `id` in the VC assertion. I > didn't see many examples of why you would want to use `id`. Here are two: > > * You have a single-use bearer token (movie ticket, age > token) that you want to determine if it's been used > before or not. Identifiers like this are useful for that > use case: > > urn:uuid:ddf810cc-c891-11eb-9fd3-67046f0b67f0 > > These sorts of identifiers also compress well when > using CBOR-LD (to 16 bytes) and help when encoding > to QR Codes. > > * You have a public Verifiable Credential where you > might want to publish other information, such as > an HTML representation of the VC. An Open Badge > URL might be a good use here. > > There are other uses, but they tend to be fairly use case specific and thus, > esoteric. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches > https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2021 21:45:42 UTC