Re: DID Formal Objection Status Update (Dec 2021)

On Dec 22, 2021, at 07:21 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ted, not sure this is the ideal thread to elaborate further

Then start a new thread!


> tl;dr the DID method registry is a controversial part of the spec.  It's going to be a challenge to get to the bottom of why that is. 
 
Really, I cannot consider this "tl;dr" seriously without more 
words.  If you feel this is not "the ideal thread" for such 
elaboration, then *please* start a new thread, and provide
more detail of your thinking so that others (including myself)
can understand your position and either concur or provide their 
(our) basis for disagreement.


Be seeing you,

Ted






--
A: Yes.                          http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html
| Q: Are you sure?           
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Senior Support & Evangelism  //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
         20 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 322, Burlington MA 01803
     Weblog    -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
     Community -- https://community.openlinksw.com/
     LinkedIn  -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
     Twitter   -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
     Facebook  -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers

Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2021 18:37:44 UTC