Re: DID Formal Objection Status Update (Dec 2021)

On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 19:40, Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
wrote:

>
> On Dec 22, 2021, at 07:21 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ted, not sure this is the ideal thread to elaborate further
>
> Then start a new thread!
>
>
> > tl;dr the DID method registry is a controversial part of the spec.  It's
> going to be a challenge to get to the bottom of why that is.
>
> Really, I cannot consider this "tl;dr" seriously without more
> words.  If you feel this is not "the ideal thread" for such
> elaboration, then *please* start a new thread, and provide
> more detail of your thinking so that others (including myself)
> can understand your position and either concur or provide their
> (our) basis for disagreement.
>

The chairs have suggested pausing this topic, so I'm going to respect that

Controversial simply means there is public disagreement.  See:

https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/faqs/2021-formal-objections/


>
>
> Be seeing you,
>
> Ted
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> A: Yes.                          http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html
> | Q: Are you sure?
> | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
> Senior Support & Evangelism  //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
>                              //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
> OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
>          20 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 322, Burlington MA 01803
>      Weblog    -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
>      Community -- https://community.openlinksw.com/
>      LinkedIn  -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
>      Twitter   -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
>      Facebook  -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
>
>
>
>
>
>