- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:04:59 -0400
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 10/20/20 9:39 AM, Orie Steele wrote: > I prefer to retain the old repo, but archive it and setup redirects > and merge the git histories. I prefer that we DO NOT do this. It leaves all sorts of dangling links out there in search engines and we don't want that. We want people to go to ONE place and we want the search engines to direct them there. We don't need to preserve the old links, but do need to preserve the old history. We should just hand the old repo over to the CCG. I was getting ready to do that when I noticed that a new repo had been created in the CCG, so then needed to work this out w/ the Chairs. Chairs, what do you want to do about this. My suggestion is: 1. Delete the current empty citizenship CCG repo. 2. Transfer the DB citizenship repo to CCG. I believe Orie's suggestion is: 1. Merge histories for DB citizenship repo to CCG citizenship repo. 2. Update DB citizenship repo to point via redirects and human-readable links to new CCG citizenship repo. 3. Archive DB citizenship repo. A Chair decision so we can move forward at this point would probably be fine since this is all administrative stuff. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2020 16:05:14 UTC