Re: [PROPOSED WORK ITEM] Citizenship Vocabulary

We are ok with either, but at this point we'll leave it to the code owners
to copy over the boilerplate files. I renamed the repo so you can do that.
https://github.com/w3c-ccg/citizenship-vocab-old

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 9:07 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> On 10/20/20 9:39 AM, Orie Steele wrote:
> > I prefer to retain the old repo, but archive it and setup redirects
> > and merge the git histories.
> I prefer that we DO NOT do this.
>
> It leaves all sorts of dangling links out there in search engines and we
> don't want that. We want people to go to ONE place and we want the
> search engines to direct them there.
>
> We don't need to preserve the old links, but do need to preserve the old
> history. We should just hand the old repo over to the CCG.
>
> I was getting ready to do that when I noticed that a new repo had been
> created in the CCG, so then needed to work this out w/ the Chairs.
>
> Chairs, what do you want to do about this. My suggestion is:
>
> 1. Delete the current empty citizenship CCG repo.
> 2. Transfer the DB citizenship repo to CCG.
>
> I believe Orie's suggestion is:
>
> 1. Merge histories for DB citizenship repo to CCG citizenship
>    repo.
> 2. Update DB citizenship repo to point via redirects and
>    human-readable links to new CCG citizenship repo.
> 3. Archive DB citizenship repo.
>
> A Chair decision so we can move forward at this point would probably be
> fine since this is all administrative stuff.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches
> https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
>
>