Re: Map of Specifications

Mark,

Sorry. I thought you were referring to the other diagram not the Snorre
diagram. My apologies. Ignore what I told you and wait for a better reply.
:-)



On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:34 PM Mark Leuba <mark.leuba@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> I agree with the positive comments about the diagram
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Cx7px2z9YslvQV1oUuumiHlpnWcsVhIl/view?usp=sharing> Snorre
> shared.  Thank you, a very useful organizing framework.
>
> Does anyone know if this is going to be maintained?  Who would I contact?
> IMS Global has published a new learner record standard along the same lines
> as Open Badges but designed for longitudinal record of learning
> <https://www.imsglobal.org/initiative/digitalcredentials> with emphasis
> on achievements in context and the evaluation of performance
> (assessments).   It's called the Comprehensive Learner Record
> <https://www.imsglobal.org/activity/comprehensive-learner-record> and
> it's being tested now by a number of organizations and groups as a VC
> presentation (or credential format in the language adopted by the authors
> of the diagram).    I am with IMS Global and would like to provide more
> information to the authors of this diagram for them to consider updating.
>
>
>>
>> * Mark Leuba*
>>  www.linkedin.com/in/markleuba
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 8:36 AM Michael Ruminer <
>> michael.ruminer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You are correct regulatory compliance would certainly be a different set
>>> of relationships and there are no such nodes in this diagram.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 11:07 PM Jim St.Clair <jim.stclair@lumedic.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just a comment, they’re both great, though I like the DIF Workgroup pdf
>>>> included regulatory compliance.
>>>>
>>>> It’s a good first pass
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>> *_______________*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Jim St.Clair *
>>>>
>>>> Chief Trust Officer (acting)
>>>>
>>>> jim.stclair@lumedic.io | 228-273-4893
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Michael Ruminer <michael.ruminer@gmail.com>
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2020 7:00 AM
>>>> *To:* Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin <snorre@diwala.io>
>>>> *Cc:* W3C Credentials CG (Public List) <public-credentials@w3.org>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Map of Specifications
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
>>>> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
>>>> know the content is safe.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I like that diagram you referenced. I have never seen it. I will study
>>>> it today. At first glance it is certainly cleaner.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 7:10 AM Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin <
>>>> snorre@diwala.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That is great, I struggled to open many of your links.
>>>>
>>>> I was able to open the github link directly to your profile with the
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> I there is alot of good arrows and pointers here.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder, what differentiates your diagram from this?
>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Cx7px2z9YslvQV1oUuumiHlpnWcsVhIl/view?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> Before I go too deep into the understanding :D
>>>>
>>>> ᐧ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 5:22 PM Michael Ruminer <
>>>> michael.ruminer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have published a v1.0 of my attempt at a map of the major
>>>> specification documents related to verifiable credentials especially those
>>>> centered around this group but also including a few DIF documents, and
>>>> MATTR documents.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The intent is to help a newcomer with understanding some of the
>>>> specification landscape. (Plus to let me acquire the same knowledge by
>>>> creating the map). It will not likely be of great value to many on this
>>>> list currently as you are already much more familiar. But for a newcomer
>>>> this may prove valuable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are some intentional omissions in this version around areas of
>>>> SIOP, storage, universal wallet and numerous other documents. This version
>>>> was considered, by me, the minimum mapping to be done. If someone walks
>>>> this tree of specifications they will then likely be in a good position to
>>>> understand everything that lies outside of it. That said, please let me
>>>> know via an issue in the repo or an email of significant errors and
>>>> omissions. Or if this has a gross conceptual error please raise that so
>>>> that I can remove it all together.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The diagram is done in diagram.net/draw.io thus free to view and edit
>>>> and is open source. https://github.com/jgraph/drawio
>>>> <https://github..com/jgraph/drawio>. If you go to https://draw.io you
>>>> can then open the diagram source file. The release also includes a png
>>>> output of the diagram.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below is the diagram release link:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/manicprogrammer/vc-spec-rel/releases
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> On a side note the following is also an excellent resource with some
>>>> similar information that if you find value in this document will certainly
>>>> find value in Nader Helmy's document:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://medium.com/decentralized-identity/overview-of-decentralized-identity-standards-f82efd9ab6c7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Michael Ruminer
>>>>
>>>> michael.ruminer@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> *Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin*
>>>>
>>>> Co-Founder & CTO, Diwala
>>>>
>>>> +47 411 611 94
>>>> www.diwala.io
>>>>
>>>>