- From: Will Abramson <wip.abramson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:03:59 +0100
- To: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFwuQWtF7Q7ObxnFYue-ji6s_GR_ZJMe4TGOpyUr9uRNkPvQ1A@mail.gmail.com>
This was really interesting thanks, It helps shed some light on the different perspectives within this community and the history of these ideas. I would encourage everyone to read this. And those who already know and buy into the ideas presented in this article but are confused by the Hyperledger/Sovrin esc ideas would do well to read article for a similar purpose https://www.cs.ru.nl/~jhh/pub/secsem/chaum1985bigbrother.pdf. It seems we often talk past each other, but we all want roughly the same things. The differences, to me at least, come down to an emphasis on different aims. It seems some of us are working to enable Verifiable Credentials that are simple, and easy to use specifically within the context of the web as a core focus with privacy important but not a deal breaker. Whereas other members are most focused on ensuring the privacy of holders when using digital credentials in any context through strong cryptography. This approach is naturally complex, so while simplicity is important it has not been the main priority. I am biased, but I just want to point out cryptographers have been talking about credentials using much the same language and for many of the same reasons since before the W3C existed. If privacy-preserving integrity assured credentials that enable independent minimal disclosure of a required set of attributes within a certain context while reducing the potential for correlation are a priority for this group, we would do well to at least have knowledge of the prior art. To be clear I am not saying cryptography is a panacea for all of the challenges in digital identity, but cryptography is the science of secure communication. And (secure) communication is key component when forming our identities, whether in the digital world or otherwise. Joe - I wonder if the cryptographers perspective is another Mental Model of Identity? Cheers, Will On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 5:54 PM Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: > Haha. Manu. > > http://manu.sporny.org/2014/credential-based-login/ > > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2020 09:04:24 UTC