Re: Question

My understanding of the FATF "travel rule" is that it applies to "VASPs"
(Virtual Asset Service Providers); i.e. exchanges and other custodial
platforms. I don't think it applies to personal wallets, but I may be
missing something... If someone more knowledgeable of these regulations can
jump in to clarify on the matter, I'd appreciate it.

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:50 AM Tony Rose <tony@proofmarket.io> wrote:

> Netki also provides a solution, that any wallet can adopt
>
> https://netki.com/transactid/
>
>
> --
> Tony Rose
> CEO | Proof Market Inc
> MedCreds.com <https://privatemedcreds.com>
> +1 650 504 5154
>
>
> *The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient
> specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of
> this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender.
> If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and
> follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not
> occur in the future.*
> On Jul 14, 2020, 10:28 AM -0700, Juan Caballero <
> juan.caballero@spherity.com>, wrote:
>
> I know one guy who has: Pelle Brandegaard!
> https://notabene.id/
>
> On 7/14/2020 6:48 PM, Moses Ma wrote:
>
> About wallets, has anyone thought about the Financial Action Task Force's
> (FATF) “Travel Rule,” which stipulates that the originators and
> beneficiaries of financial transactions over $1,000 must be identified and
> that their personal data must “travel” with those transactions?  What are
> the implications of such rules on what we’re doing here?
>
> --
> -----------------
> Juan Caballero
> Communications & Research Lead
> Spherity GmbH, Emil-Figge-Straße 80, 44227 Dortmund
> Next meetup 18/5: https://spherity_open_office2.eventbrite.com/
>
> Berlin-based: +49 1573 5994525
> Signal/whatsapp: +1 415-3101351
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2020 01:20:40 UTC