Re: Real BTCR DID Document

To Chris’s original question – I’ve been using a fork of https://github.com/Thalhammer/jwt-cpp for our JWS/JWT work (though not DID specific).   (FWIW: my fork adds support for non-JSON payloads and detached signatures)

Leonard

From: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at 4:41 PM
To: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Real BTCR DID Document
Resent-From: <public-credentials@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at 4:39 PM



On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:35 PM Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com<mailto:dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote:

On 2/12/20 2:24 PM, Christopher Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:03 AM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
> wrote:
>
>     I suggest changing the context to https://www.w3.org/ns/did/v1<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fns%2Fdid%2Fv1&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7Cbe98eac240234caf7c9808d7b00448f9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637171404767096336&sdata=Xmhga3yPy0WyfxVvYNe6%2FUqTJw5r1KdwUa5k69%2BmwlU%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> Will do.

-1 to that. That context is NOT stable and won't be stable until the DID
WG decides that it is. You should continue using a v0.x versioned
context until the official v1 context is stable. This is an unfortunate
side effect of the in progress standards process.

So should I continue to use
https://w3id.org/did/v0.11<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3id.org%2Fdid%2Fv0.11&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7Cbe98eac240234caf7c9808d7b00448f9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637171404767096336&sdata=UuUADqcByhjh6F3SwMq%2F8Tp6pexs7xXX0qA4rltdZBc%3D&reserved=0> ?

What is the best online web tool I can use to validate my DID Document against this context?

— Christopher Allen [via iPhone]