- From: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:39:04 -0800
- To: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:39:29 UTC
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:35 PM Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 2/12/20 2:24 PM, Christopher Allen wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:03 AM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> > > > wrote: > > > > I suggest changing the context to https://www.w3.org/ns/did/v1 > > > > > > Will do. > > -1 to that. That context is NOT stable and won't be stable until the DID > WG decides that it is. You should continue using a v0.x versioned > context until the official v1 context is stable. This is an unfortunate > side effect of the in progress standards process. So should I continue to use https://w3id.org/did/v0.11 ? What is the best online web tool I can use to validate my DID Document against this context? — Christopher Allen [via iPhone] >
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:39:29 UTC