W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > April 2020

Re: Question on use of base64 vs base64url in modern specifications

From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:02:27 +0200
To: public-credentials@w3.org
Message-ID: <9833e2df-c221-0622-b845-a4846d58e2b0@gmail.com>
Claiming that Base64Url is a problem due to one or two [marginal] implementations seems counter-productive.

The abundance of systems based on the JOSE stack set the de-facto standard for Base64Url: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7515#appendix-C

A human-readable backup-key consisting of 20 or more characters would probably also need to be divided in sections like a credit card number as well as having a checksum.  A backup/restore facility could deal with that, making you independent of the computing system's representation of data.  Bech32 seems like a pretty good candidate for "human-readable" data.

Received on Monday, 27 April 2020 03:02:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:58 UTC