Re: Update on DID Resolution CCG work item

+1

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:46 PM Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com>
wrote:

> Hello CCG,
>
> Many of you are also active in the DID WG, but for those who are not, I
> wanted to give a general update on the DID Resolution work item.
>
> So far, the DID Resolution spec
> <https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-resolution/> has been a separate document
> with the status of a work item in the CCG (see meeting page
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qYBaXQMUoB86Alquu7WBtWOxsS8SMhp1fioYKEGCabE/>
> ).
>
> Since the DID WG F2F meeting
> <https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/Meetings/F2F/2020.01.Amsterdam> in
> Amsterdam earlier this year, there has been growing support for adding
> certain DID Resolution related content into the DID Core specification,
> specifically the "interfaces" or "contracts" of the DID Resolution and DID
> URL Dereferencing including their inputs and outputs. There is now a set of
> PRs 262 <https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/262>, 263
> <https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/263>, 264
> <https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/264>, 265
> <https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/265> on the DID Core spec, which
> are based on earlier PRs 247 <https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/247>
> and 253 <https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/253>. In my opinion, all
> this makes good sense and is heading into the right direction.
>
> Regarding the weekly DID Resolution calls in the CCG, there has been
> reduced participation during the last few weeks. I believe this is because
> 1. attention and progress on this topic has now partially shifted into the
> DID WG, and because 2. there is now another overlapping community call at
> the regular time (the Secure Data Storage call).
>
> I therefore propose the following next steps for this CCG work item:
>
> 1. Hold the regular DID Resolution weekly call tomorrow to discuss how the
> developments on DID Core will affect the DID Resolution spec. (I will send
> a separate reminder e-mail as usual)
>
> 2. NOT hold the regular DID Resolution weekly call next week due to IIW.
>
> 3. After that, discuss new perspectives and potential new call schedule
> for the DID Resolution work item.
>
> Markus
>
>
>