Re: Performance question for JSON-LD with vc.js

> There is *NOTHING* in the JSON-LD specification, in the definition of
context (https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#the-context) that
mandates that the URI/IRI be (a) resolvable or (b) that any such resolution
be machine readable.

It might be worth bringing up that concern to the JSON-LD CG for the next
version of the spec, over at https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/

Further down, in that same section, the wording "In JSON-LD documents,
contexts may also be specified inline. This has the advantage that
documents can be processed even in the absence of a connection to the Web."
is the part that points out that contexts need to be resolvable (and,
again, in actual implementation it's recommended that they're stored
locally, like npm packages, and not fetched over the web).


On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 5:43 PM Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote:

> Thinking of a context that way, Dmitri, is not correct.
>
>
>
> There is **NOTHING** in the JSON-LD specification, in the definition of
> context (https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#the-context) that
> *mandates* that the URI/IRI be (a) resolvable or (b) that any such
> resolution be machine readable.  Same is true with the VC spec (
> https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/#contexts).
>
>
>
> I agree that it is recommended to do that (
> https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/#contexts, paragraph 4, under
> @context) – no question about it.  However, it is **not** a requirement
> (MUST) and as such using a context in that way still produces a 100% valid
> LD doc and VC.
>
>
>
> Standards are written with very clear language for a reason and they
> should be implemented accordingly.
>
>
>
> Leonard
>
>
>
> *From: *Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *"dzagidulin@gmail.com" <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 1:00 PM
> *To: *Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Credentials Community Group
> <public-credentials@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Performance question for JSON-LD with vc.js
>
>
>
> Hi Leonard,
>
>
>
> So, you can think of a context as exactly functionally equivalent to an
> NPM package (or Maven, or ruby Gem, or whatever).
>
> Which means that, by definition, is has to be machine readable (it's a
> common source of confusion to confuse contexts and human-readable vocab
> documentation -- think of the human-readable part as a README file for an
> npm package).
>
> Does it have to be accessible - sure, but just like with NPM packages, you
> have the control of /when/ it's accessible.
>
> You /could/, in theory, override your require() functions so that it loads
> NPM packages from the web, in your code. But even with caching, that would
> be a wildly impractical approach, full of performance and security issues.
>
> Instead, what most developers do (and what we recommend to do with
> contexts), is to fix them at /build time/. That is, version them, bundle
> them locally with your code, and only allow your document loaders to
> interface with those local versions.
>
>
>
> Does that make more sense?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:41 PM Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dmitri – that also forces all contexts to be (a) accessible and (b)
> machine readable…neither of which a mandatory requirement of either JSON-LD
> or VC itself.
>
>
>
> Leonard
>
>
>
> *From: *Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *"dzagidulin@gmail.com" <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 11:39 AM
> *To: *Anil Lewis <anillewi@ca.ibm.com>, Credentials Community Group <
> public-credentials@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Performance question for JSON-LD with vc.js
> *Resent-From: *<public-credentials@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 11:38 AM
>
>
>
> Hi Anil,
>
>
>
> > When using vc.js, I have observed that if the pre-configured contexts
> are not loaded, I am unable to even sign/verify the credential. I might
> have to come up with our own processing code to circumvent this issue.
>
>
>
> For security reasons, the vc-js library /does not/ allow loading of
> arbitrary contexts from the web. You have to explicitly allow-list them, by
> providing a document loader function tailored to your usecase.
>
> Absolutely happy to walk you through this, please feel free to open an
> issue on https://github.com/digitalbazaar/vc-js/issues
> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdigitalbazaar%2Fvc-js%2Fissues&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7Ca959982f4c084abc396e08d7d72760d7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637214436440165151&sdata=fDhYF5mSzspb%2Bp9681N%2BdDOoImIl3KTFD2FkmGqrrS8%3D&reserved=0>
> !
>
>