The chairs can discuss when we meet later this week and propose some options. On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 8:32 AM Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@evernym.com> wrote: > I agree that the topic is highly relevant to this group. > > I now have about a dozen non-CCG members who have asked to be involved, in > addition to about 8-10 from the CCG. If we host the work as a formal CCG > initiative, it would be convenient for CCG members. However, it would > require those non-CCG people to become CCG members, and we would be > co-mingling this topic with other CCG agenda items and handling it through > the CCG's standard work management process. > > My own feeling is that it is probably worth it to move it into the CCG > once the group has some true momentum and coherent things to share--but > that bootstrapping it inside CCG is more trouble than it's worth in the > very early stages. So what if we planned to bring it into the CCG in, say, > 4-8 weeks, with the group invited to come to a CCG meeting to officially > propose its adoption? > > I would be happy to turn the mailing list I created over to some CCG owner > immediately so the CCG could do that management. Is there a logical person > to do that? Or, would the CCG prefer to create the mailing list its own > way? I don't think it should be co-equal with the normal CCG mailing list. > > --Daniel > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:20 AM Philipp Schmidt <ps1@media.mit.edu> wrote: > >> >>> >>> Just my off the cuff $0.02... throwing it out there in case it resonates >>> w/ anyone else. >>> >> >> +1 >> >> Maybe use subject line tags to make filtering easier. I agree with Manu >> that the topic seems relevant. >> >> P >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2019 17:38:05 UTC