W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > May 2019

Re: committing fraud with credentials

From: Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 10:37:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFmmOzc8_-m4Os4c_m3domKXRMb9Tk9vM2B=tJvctUBf5WoOGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@evernym.com>, Joe Andrieu <joe@legreq.com>, Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
Cc: Philipp Schmidt <ps1@media.mit.edu>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
The chairs can discuss when we meet later this week and propose some

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 8:32 AM Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@evernym.com>

> I agree that the topic is highly relevant to this group.
> I now have about a dozen non-CCG members who have asked to be involved, in
> addition to about 8-10 from the CCG. If we host the work as a formal CCG
> initiative, it would be convenient for CCG members. However, it would
> require those non-CCG people to become CCG members, and we would be
> co-mingling this topic with other CCG agenda items and handling it through
> the CCG's standard work management process.
> My own feeling is that it is probably worth it to move it into the CCG
> once the group has some true momentum and coherent things to share--but
> that bootstrapping it inside CCG is more trouble than it's worth in the
> very early stages. So what if we planned to bring it into the CCG in, say,
> 4-8 weeks, with the group invited to come to a CCG meeting to officially
> propose its adoption?
> I would be happy to turn the mailing list I created over to some CCG owner
> immediately so the CCG could do that management. Is there a logical person
> to do that? Or, would the CCG prefer to create the mailing list its own
> way? I don't think it should be co-equal with the normal CCG mailing list.
> --Daniel
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:20 AM Philipp Schmidt <ps1@media.mit.edu> wrote:
>>> Just my off the cuff $0.02... throwing it out there in case it resonates
>>> w/ anyone else.
>> +1
>> Maybe use subject line tags to make filtering easier. I agree with Manu
>> that the topic seems relevant.
>> P
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2019 17:38:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:54 UTC