Re: committing fraud with credentials

I agree that the topic is highly relevant to this group.

I now have about a dozen non-CCG members who have asked to be involved, in
addition to about 8-10 from the CCG. If we host the work as a formal CCG
initiative, it would be convenient for CCG members. However, it would
require those non-CCG people to become CCG members, and we would be
co-mingling this topic with other CCG agenda items and handling it through
the CCG's standard work management process.

My own feeling is that it is probably worth it to move it into the CCG once
the group has some true momentum and coherent things to share--but that
bootstrapping it inside CCG is more trouble than it's worth in the very
early stages. So what if we planned to bring it into the CCG in, say, 4-8
weeks, with the group invited to come to a CCG meeting to officially
propose its adoption?

I would be happy to turn the mailing list I created over to some CCG owner
immediately so the CCG could do that management. Is there a logical person
to do that? Or, would the CCG prefer to create the mailing list its own
way? I don't think it should be co-equal with the normal CCG mailing list.

--Daniel

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:20 AM Philipp Schmidt <ps1@media.mit.edu> wrote:

>
>>
>> Just my off the cuff $0.02... throwing it out there in case it resonates
>> w/ anyone else.
>>
>
> +1
>
> Maybe use subject line tags to make filtering easier. I agree with Manu
> that the topic seems relevant.
>
> P
>
>