- From: =Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@evernym.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:50:57 -0700
- To: Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com>
- Cc: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAjunnb2ZtVB97ruhtKFmRDzLXo1GhEv4GSHr_NikW7EGjyJ=g@mail.gmail.com>
Markus, this is cool and a great test of the ABNF. However I can't figure out why some of the examples won't parse. For example, what's the issue with the error below? Parse problem for did:example:1234;version-time=2019-05-23T14:22:27;service=agent: Not a valid DID URL: extra data found 234;version-time=2019-05-23T14:22:27;service=agent ^ Also, just a reminder to everyone that we'll have our weekly combined DID Spec and DID Resolution Spec webmeeting today from 1-3PM Pacific Time, 20:00-22:00 UTC. Zoom webmeeting details are on the meeting page <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qYBaXQMUoB86Alquu7WBtWOxsS8SMhp1fioYKEGCabE/edit?usp=sharing> . On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:25 AM Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com> wrote: > To help with the ABNF discussion, I built a simple frontend for a parser > for the proposed "matrix parameters" syntax, see here: > https://parser.uniresolver.io/ > > Note that not all examples can be successfully parsed - this is > intentional. > > (This uses the aParse parser generator <http://www.parse2.com/>, the > generated parser code is here > <https://github.com/peacekeeper/did-common-java/tree/matrix-parameters>). > > Markus > On 4/10/19 5:24 PM, Markus Sabadello wrote: > > After various conversations e.g. on recent DID Spec and DID Resolution > calls, there's now a proposal > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TctFY8euBH2wq7Z8c9KccICDZUGZplvhoqlHlFMahGk/> > to use "matrix parameters" in DID URL syntax. > There's also a second document > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VpYPvUw2o-01e727bCy2V-0MUEe0_NB-EqX677scQbI/> > that lists use cases for such parameters. > > That second document also compares other options for expressing resolution > parameters (using colons instead of semicolons). > > Matrix parameters were first proposed > <https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/MatrixURIs.html> in 1996. > > Please review and post comments, and let's see if we have consensus to > adopt a DID ABNF (excuse me, a DID grammar) based on this proposal. > > If you have time, please join tomorrow's combined DID Spec and DID > Resolution Spec call > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qYBaXQMUoB86Alquu7WBtWOxsS8SMhp1fioYKEGCabE/> > where we will discuss this. > > Markus and =Drummond > > > >
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2019 16:51:33 UTC