- From: Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:24:09 +0200
- To: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <a1ac6df9-6c36-5a81-5bad-2c541a9bec00@danubetech.com>
To help with the ABNF discussion, I built a simple frontend for a parser for the proposed "matrix parameters" syntax, see here: https://parser.uniresolver.io/ Note that not all examples can be successfully parsed - this is intentional. (This uses the aParse parser generator <http://www.parse2.com/>, the generated parser code is here <https://github.com/peacekeeper/did-common-java/tree/matrix-parameters>). Markus On 4/10/19 5:24 PM, Markus Sabadello wrote: > > After various conversations e.g. on recent DID Spec and DID Resolution > calls, there's now a proposal > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TctFY8euBH2wq7Z8c9KccICDZUGZplvhoqlHlFMahGk/> > to use "matrix parameters" in DID URL syntax. > There's also a second document > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VpYPvUw2o-01e727bCy2V-0MUEe0_NB-EqX677scQbI/> > that lists use cases for such parameters. > > That second document also compares other options for expressing > resolution parameters (using colons instead of semicolons). > > Matrix parameters were first proposed > <https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/MatrixURIs.html> in 1996. > > Please review and post comments, and let's see if we have consensus to > adopt a DID ABNF (excuse me, a DID grammar) based on this proposal. > > If you have time, please join tomorrow's combined DID Spec and DID > Resolution Spec call > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qYBaXQMUoB86Alquu7WBtWOxsS8SMhp1fioYKEGCabE/> > where we will discuss this. > > Markus and =Drummond > >
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2019 15:24:34 UTC