Re: Matrix parameters for DID URLs

This one has colon characters in the matrix parameter value, the current grammar doesn't allow that.

Markus

On 11 April 2019 18:50:57 CEST, =Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@evernym.com> wrote:
>Markus, this is cool and a great test of the ABNF. However I can't
>figure
>out why some of the examples won't parse. For example, what's the issue
>with the error below?
>
>Parse problem for
>did:example:1234;version-time=2019-05-23T14:22:27;service=agent: Not a
>valid DID URL: extra data found
>234;version-time=2019-05-23T14:22:27;service=agent ^
>
>Also, just a reminder to everyone that we'll have our weekly combined
>DID
>Spec and DID Resolution Spec webmeeting today from 1-3PM Pacific Time,
>20:00-22:00 UTC. Zoom webmeeting details are on the meeting page
><https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qYBaXQMUoB86Alquu7WBtWOxsS8SMhp1fioYKEGCabE/edit?usp=sharing>
>.
>
>On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:25 AM Markus Sabadello
><markus@danubetech.com>
>wrote:
>
>> To help with the ABNF discussion, I built a simple frontend for a
>parser
>> for the proposed "matrix parameters" syntax, see here:
>> https://parser.uniresolver.io/
>>
>> Note that not all examples can be successfully parsed - this is
>> intentional.
>>
>> (This uses the aParse parser generator <http://www.parse2.com/>, the
>> generated parser code is here
>>
><https://github.com/peacekeeper/did-common-java/tree/matrix-parameters>).
>>
>> Markus
>> On 4/10/19 5:24 PM, Markus Sabadello wrote:
>>
>> After various conversations e.g. on recent DID Spec and DID
>Resolution
>> calls, there's now a proposal
>>
><https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TctFY8euBH2wq7Z8c9KccICDZUGZplvhoqlHlFMahGk/>
>> to use "matrix parameters" in DID URL syntax.
>> There's also a second document
>>
><https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VpYPvUw2o-01e727bCy2V-0MUEe0_NB-EqX677scQbI/>
>> that lists use cases for such parameters.
>>
>> That second document also compares other options for expressing
>resolution
>> parameters (using colons instead of semicolons).
>>
>> Matrix parameters were first proposed
>> <https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/MatrixURIs.html> in 1996.
>>
>> Please review and post comments, and let's see if we have consensus
>to
>> adopt a DID ABNF (excuse me, a DID grammar) based on this proposal.
>>
>> If you have time, please join tomorrow's combined DID Spec and DID
>> Resolution Spec call
>>
><https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qYBaXQMUoB86Alquu7WBtWOxsS8SMhp1fioYKEGCabE/>
>> where we will discuss this.
>>
>> Markus and =Drummond
>>
>>
>>
>>