- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 07:09:51 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok2_35sCs_9YLuZKN_gBk5E2rNXryM_Th7-qvAqAMoi0VQ@mail.gmail.com>
very quickly. was looking at the overview[1] and saw the concept "root of trust <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_anchor>" which hyperlinks to Trust Anchor[2]. I suggest either defining a new wikipedia page for the term[3] rather than simply a redirect, or change the term used in the spec doc. more l8r. Tim.H. [1] https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/#overview [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_anchor [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Root_of_Trust&action=history On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 17:49 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 08:20 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: > >> On 10/18/2017 01:50 PM, Kim Hamilton Duffy wrote: >> > Manu -- what are your thoughts? >> >> Steven, at this point the only feedback we're looking for is only >> technical in nature and even then, based on whether the text reflects >> consensus at Rebooting the Web of Trust 5, which you weren't at. >> > > Is this a RWOT spec? > > If so, it should be marked as such. This CG can then make one inspired > by it, if/as required. > > Therein, the spec should be moved to the RWOT repo? > > >> >> In other words, the spec isn't ready for your kind of valuable feedback >> yet... it would largely be a waste of your time to correct the large >> swaths of the spec text that may be confusing for non-implementers that >> are buried in the details right now. >> >> I expect that we may need your review help in a few months time from >> now. As always, thanks for offering and we will certainly take you up on >> it once it becomes a good use of your time. >> > > I'll review and have a look; and am not sure of the specifics, whilst > noting important principles herein. > > IMHO: it's important to be inclusive and the W3 IPR framework is not > unintentionally misaligned in some way that is against the spirit of this > structure. > > I guess. try not to oversimplify imho. might end-up with unintended > consequences. (technically speaking). > > >> -- manu >> >> best wishes, > > tim. > > >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built >> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/ >> >>
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 07:10:25 UTC