- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:59:48 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok2esPx8=FYdGrB1K1YePc3jG0pPxbGGkfUXUJGjyAawtA@mail.gmail.com>
Found a relevent IETF RFC[4] re: trust anchors[2] On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 18:09 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > very quickly. was looking at the overview[1] and saw the concept "root > of trust <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_anchor>" which hyperlinks > to Trust Anchor[2]. I suggest either defining a new wikipedia page for the > term[3] rather than simply a redirect, or change the term used in the spec > doc. > > more l8r. > > Tim.H. > > [1] https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/#overview > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_anchor > [3] > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Root_of_Trust&action=history > [4] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5914 > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 17:49 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 08:20 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 10/18/2017 01:50 PM, Kim Hamilton Duffy wrote: >>> > Manu -- what are your thoughts? >>> >>> Steven, at this point the only feedback we're looking for is only >>> technical in nature and even then, based on whether the text reflects >>> consensus at Rebooting the Web of Trust 5, which you weren't at. >>> >> >> Is this a RWOT spec? >> >> If so, it should be marked as such. This CG can then make one inspired >> by it, if/as required. >> >> Therein, the spec should be moved to the RWOT repo? >> >> >>> >>> In other words, the spec isn't ready for your kind of valuable feedback >>> yet... it would largely be a waste of your time to correct the large >>> swaths of the spec text that may be confusing for non-implementers that >>> are buried in the details right now. >>> >>> I expect that we may need your review help in a few months time from >>> now. As always, thanks for offering and we will certainly take you up on >>> it once it becomes a good use of your time. >>> >> >> I'll review and have a look; and am not sure of the specifics, whilst >> noting important principles herein. >> >> IMHO: it's important to be inclusive and the W3 IPR framework is not >> unintentionally misaligned in some way that is against the spirit of this >> structure. >> >> I guess. try not to oversimplify imho. might end-up with unintended >> consequences. (technically speaking). >> >> >>> -- manu >>> >>> best wishes, >> >> tim. >> >> >>> -- >>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >>> blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built >>> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/ >>> >>>
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 10:00:24 UTC