- From: Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 21:27:10 +0000
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Bohdan Andriyiv <drabiv@gmail.com>, Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com>, "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>, "W3C Digital Verification CG (Public List)" <public-digital-verification@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFmmOzf4=f32So6GWQs6K5Jff0ea=Kd69xNuMRdmmGyieX4HbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the pointer on the WebID CG, Tim -- I'll follow up. Bodhdan -- yes, the option will be something including "self-sovereign identity". I updated that in the poll. Coming soon. On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:34 AM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > why not 'natural person identity', something that relates moreover to > latin / english (as w3c is an english speaking union) as to ensure we're > not unnecessarily relating legal concepts to the underlying sought outcome. > > also; it's very important people speak to Henry Story / WebID CG; as the > ID portion has really been in their arena for sometime with similar sorts > of outcomes sought; whilst perhaps, using a different approach. > > Tim.H. > > On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 at 18:19 Bohdan Andriyiv <drabiv@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am completely new to the group, but if the opinion of complete noob can >> help I am for third option – something with "self-sovereign identity". >> >> --Bohdan >> >> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 at 01:58 Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> To move forward with the naming discussion, we are suggesting the >>> following approach. >>> >>> First, we select a name *category*; i.e. we don't have to select a >>> specific name, just the general characteristics. At the 11 July meeting, >>> we'll discuss the initial set we've identified (options below, based on >>> community discussion) and determine if any others need to be added. >>> >>> After the 11 July meeting, we'll send a poll to choose one of these >>> options. If applicable, based on those results, we'll refine to specific >>> name choices, which will be voted on in a subsequent (and final) poll. >>> >>> Keeping the current name "Credentials Community Group" introduces >>> another important decision point, which relates to the wording around >>> inclusion of centralized identity approaches in the mission statement. We'd >>> like to include that in the poll as well. >>> >>> This expands into 3 total (current) options for the first poll: >>> >>> *Option 1* >>> >>> - Keep the same name, "Credentials Community Group" >>> - Update mission to include self sovereign identity, and make >>> explicit that the scope is not limited to decentralized approaches >>> >>> *Option 2* >>> >>> - Keep the same name, "Credentials Community Group" >>> - Update mission to include self sovereign identity >>> - This does not mean that centralized approaches are out of scope -- >>> we are just not calling this out in the mission statement >>> >>> *Option 3* >>> >>> - Rename to something including "self-sovereign identity" >>> - Exact name TBD >>> - In this case, the question of wording around centralized identity >>> approaches in the mission statement is less pressing. Again, they will be >>> in scope, just not called out explicitly. >>> >>> >>> — Kim Hamilton & Christopher Allen, co-chairs >>> -- >>> Kim Hamilton Duffy >>> Principal Engineer | Learning Machine + MIT Media Lab >>> Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group >>> 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139 >>> 12001 N. Central Expy, Suite 1025, Dallas, TX 75243 >>> >>> kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu >>> 425-652-0150 <(425)%20652-0150> | LearningMachine.com >>> >>
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2017 21:27:50 UTC