- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:33:13 +0000
- To: Bohdan Andriyiv <drabiv@gmail.com>, Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com>, "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>, "W3C Digital Verification CG (Public List)" <public-digital-verification@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok2c_CyuARZOwHMAY3ktFLAh1hNBLfcpWnyA3S18QEjzYw@mail.gmail.com>
why not 'natural person identity', something that relates moreover to latin / english (as w3c is an english speaking union) as to ensure we're not unnecessarily relating legal concepts to the underlying sought outcome. also; it's very important people speak to Henry Story / WebID CG; as the ID portion has really been in their arena for sometime with similar sorts of outcomes sought; whilst perhaps, using a different approach. Tim.H. On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 at 18:19 Bohdan Andriyiv <drabiv@gmail.com> wrote: > I am completely new to the group, but if the opinion of complete noob can > help I am for third option – something with "self-sovereign identity". > > --Bohdan > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 at 01:58 Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> To move forward with the naming discussion, we are suggesting the >> following approach. >> >> First, we select a name *category*; i.e. we don't have to select a >> specific name, just the general characteristics. At the 11 July meeting, >> we'll discuss the initial set we've identified (options below, based on >> community discussion) and determine if any others need to be added. >> >> After the 11 July meeting, we'll send a poll to choose one of these >> options. If applicable, based on those results, we'll refine to specific >> name choices, which will be voted on in a subsequent (and final) poll. >> >> Keeping the current name "Credentials Community Group" introduces another >> important decision point, which relates to the wording around inclusion of >> centralized identity approaches in the mission statement. We'd like to >> include that in the poll as well. >> >> This expands into 3 total (current) options for the first poll: >> >> *Option 1* >> >> - Keep the same name, "Credentials Community Group" >> - Update mission to include self sovereign identity, and make >> explicit that the scope is not limited to decentralized approaches >> >> *Option 2* >> >> - Keep the same name, "Credentials Community Group" >> - Update mission to include self sovereign identity >> - This does not mean that centralized approaches are out of scope -- >> we are just not calling this out in the mission statement >> >> *Option 3* >> >> - Rename to something including "self-sovereign identity" >> - Exact name TBD >> - In this case, the question of wording around centralized identity >> approaches in the mission statement is less pressing. Again, they will be >> in scope, just not called out explicitly. >> >> >> — Kim Hamilton & Christopher Allen, co-chairs >> -- >> Kim Hamilton Duffy >> Principal Engineer | Learning Machine + MIT Media Lab >> Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group >> 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139 >> 12001 N. Central Expy, Suite 1025, Dallas, TX 75243 >> >> kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu >> 425-652-0150 <(425)%20652-0150> | LearningMachine.com >> >
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2017 08:33:57 UTC