- From: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 17:07:49 +0100
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
Unfortunately there was no time to discuss credential expiry time on the call today. Dan, can you please advise how and when it is determined that a consensus has been reached on this topic regards David On 24/05/2016 15:41, Daniel Burnett wrote: > Good point. I am not trying to argue for or against any particular > change. I sent the email only because the discussion started in the > context of the data model, even though it didn't necessarily stay there. > > If we end up deciding on a change to the data model then, obviously, I > would need to reflect that in the data model spec document we're developing. > > -- dan > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Stone, Matt <matt.stone@pearson.com > <mailto:matt.stone@pearson.com>> wrote: > > I won't be there today, but be very clear to distinguish between > the expiration of the credential (in the data model, like an issue > date) and the "time since last verified" that the protocol would > care about. > > -stone > > > ===== > Matt Stone > 501-291-1599 <tel:501-291-1599> > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Daniel Burnett > <danielcburnett@gmail.com <mailto:danielcburnett@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Manu, > > There has been a mailing list thread [1] about whether a > credential expiration date property should be required in the > data model. It appears to me that, so far, there isn't > consensus either way. You might want to add it as an agenda > item we can discuss if time permits at the end of the meeting. > > -- dan > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2016May/0023.html > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Manu Sporny > <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We have a Verifiable Claims Task Force call tomorrow to get > an intro to > the US Department of Homeland Security's Blockchain research > project > around identity from Anil John (who initiated the project). > We'll also > provide a rundown of what happened at the United Nations > ID2020 summit, > the Rebooting Web of Trust Design Workshop, and how those events > dovetail with the work we're doing here. Finally, we'll get > an update on > progress on deliverables for the upcoming W3C Blockchain > workshop and > Web Payments IG meeting on July 1st 2016. > > The meeting is open to the general public. There are no > Intellectual > Property Release requirements. The call will be recorded and > minuted to > ensure we're capturing everyone's concerns properly. > > If you want to add anything to or modify the proposed agenda > below, > please respond via the mailing list or make a note of it at the > beginning of the call. If your organization would not like > the call to > be recorded, let me know and we'll disable the audio recording. > > ========== > Tuesday, May 24th 2016 > Time: 11am Boston > Text Chat: http://tinyurl.com/w3c-vctf > irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#vctf > <http://irc.w3.org:6665/#vctf> > Voice: sip:vctf@96.89.14.196 <mailto:sip%3Avctf@96.89.14.196> > tel:+1-540-961-4469;ext=6306 > <tel:%2B1-540-961-4469%3Bext%3D6306> (extension 6306) > Duration: 60 minutes > Scribes: MattC, MattS, Longley, DanB, Gregg, Nate, Brian, > ========== > > Proposed Agenda > --------------- > > 1. Introduction to Anil John and DHS Blockchain R&D > * https://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/867797 > 2. United Nations ID2020 Summit Recap > 3. Rebooting Web of Trust Design Workshop Recap > 4. Update on Work Items > * Charter > * Use Cases > * FAQ > * Verifiable Claims Data Model Specification > * Survey Results/Overview > * One page W3C AC Rep Summary (1 page) > * Architecture Summary (1-2 pages) > * Implementers Summary (1 page, incorporated into survey) > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu > Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Web Browser API Incubation Anti-Pattern > http://manu.sporny.org/2016/browser-api-incubation-antipattern/ > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2016 16:08:23 UTC