- From: Victoriano Giralt <victoriano@uma.es>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 12:41:15 +0200
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <57418CCB.4010408@uma.es>
On 21/05/16 20:44, David Chadwick wrote:
> You are mixing up the attribute/claim, date of birth (or similar) which
> lasts forever, and the credential, which is a cryptographic digital
> representation of it. This has to have an expiry time due to the
> inherent weakness of the crypto.
You are very right, David, it is possibly me being thick because of the
cabin pressure. I should read threads twice before responding from a
plane :-) You already noted that in the thread, and you are right,
signatures should be refreshed because of crypto.
> regards
double those ;-)
--
Victoriano Giralt CIO
University of Malaga
+34952131415 SPAIN
==================================================================
Note: signature.asc is the electronic signature of present message
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure ?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email ?
Received on Sunday, 22 May 2016 12:00:12 UTC