- From: Victoriano Giralt <victoriano@uma.es>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 12:41:15 +0200
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <57418CCB.4010408@uma.es>
On 21/05/16 20:44, David Chadwick wrote: > You are mixing up the attribute/claim, date of birth (or similar) which > lasts forever, and the credential, which is a cryptographic digital > representation of it. This has to have an expiry time due to the > inherent weakness of the crypto. You are very right, David, it is possibly me being thick because of the cabin pressure. I should read threads twice before responding from a plane :-) You already noted that in the thread, and you are right, signatures should be refreshed because of crypto. > regards double those ;-) -- Victoriano Giralt CIO University of Malaga +34952131415 SPAIN ================================================================== Note: signature.asc is the electronic signature of present message A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure ? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email ?
Received on Sunday, 22 May 2016 12:00:12 UTC