W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Expiry time in Data Model

From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 12:26:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM1Sok3Loxbt1zzdFO8P5PSDY0DvODFuYVEyMrCGG2e8+Ev01Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Victoriano Giralt <victoriano@uma.es>, public-credentials@w3.org
What about version control and therein; 'get latest'...

On Sun, 22 May 2016 at 22:01 Victoriano Giralt <victoriano@uma.es> wrote:

> On 21/05/16 20:44, David Chadwick wrote:
> > You are mixing up the attribute/claim, date of birth (or similar) which
> > lasts forever, and the credential, which is a cryptographic digital
> > representation of it. This has to have an expiry time due to the
> > inherent weakness of the crypto.
>
> You are very right, David, it is possibly me being thick because of the
> cabin pressure. I should read threads twice before responding from a
> plane :-) You already noted that in the thread, and you are right,
> signatures should be refreshed because of crypto.
>
> > regards
>
> double those ;-)
>
> --
> Victoriano Giralt                             CIO
>                                               University of Malaga
> +34952131415                                  SPAIN
> ==================================================================
> Note: signature.asc is the electronic signature of present message
> A: Yes.
> > Q: Are you sure ?
> >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email ?
>
>
Received on Sunday, 22 May 2016 12:27:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:29 UTC