Re: Short list for Verifiable Claims docs

Thanks David, both of your changes have been applied to the document.

On 06/15/2016 10:12 AM, David Ezell wrote:
> /3 large multinational for-profit corporations with revenues in the 
> multiple billions of dollars per year in revenue stated that the
> work should be incubated further before entering the standardization
> process./
> 
> This sounds a bit combative.  Maybe something like “Three long-term
> W3C members have suggested that the work should be…” could be more
> appropriate.

Fixed.

The language wasn't intended to be combative, but rather note that the
negative reactions came from some very large/wealthy organizations with
many customers.

https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-ig/commit/76b14eddc78dbf3a7e2a2da5ec5772a6b94c1275

> 2)      “Verifiable Claims Working Group Primer”
> 
> http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/primer/
> 
> In the document, this sentence appears:
> 
> /“The Credentials Community Group, Verifiable Claims Task Force, and
> Web Payments Interest Group have performed…”/
> 
> Might be more accurate as:
> 
> /“The Credentials Community Group and the Verifiable Claims Task
> Force of the Web Payments Interest Group have performed…”/

Fixed.

https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-ig/commit/76b14eddc78dbf3a7e2a2da5ec5772a6b94c1275

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Web Browser API Incubation Anti-Pattern
http://manu.sporny.org/2016/browser-api-incubation-antipattern/

Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2016 21:37:01 UTC