W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2016

Re: Request for terminology input - consumer/inspector/TBD Credential

From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 08:07:58 -0700
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <943f96c0-4e16-2c49-401b-3ceeb99df0c8@sunshine.net>
On 6/7/16 8:00 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> 1. If you propose something, make sure that you're the champion for
>    that term. Don't suggest something that you wouldn't want as the #1
>    pick.

Based on Manu's interesting rules of voting, I hereby retract 
"Reader". I only proposed it yesterday and would need to consider it 
my #1, and make a case against the others.

But seeing David Chadwick's explanation for "Relying Party", which I 
accept, I now prefer that term.

I suggest ignoring "Reader" in the considerations and voting unless 
someone else decides to champion it with new reasoning.


> 2. If you propose something, make an argument for the use of that term
>    and an argument against all of the other terms.
> 3. Don't send "me too" emails. If you want to weigh in, please make
>    sure you're making an argument that no one else has made in order to
>    cut down on the number of emails sent to the mailing list.
> We are going to collect input until midnight on Thursday and put up two
> Generalized Instant Runoff Voting[1] polls on Friday. The polls will be
> open for a week and will determine the final terminology we'll use
> across all of the documents.
> -- manu
> [1]https://www.opavote.com/methods#instant-runoff-voting
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 15:08:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:53 UTC