- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:17:19 -0700
- To: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
"Relying Party" is acceptable to me. “Consumer” would probably be better if the credential were generated by a “Producer”. Gregg Kellogg gregg@greggkellogg.net > On Jun 8, 2016, at 8:07 AM, Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net> wrote: > > On 6/7/16 8:00 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: >> 1. If you propose something, make sure that you're the champion for >> that term. Don't suggest something that you wouldn't want as the #1 >> pick. > > Based on Manu's interesting rules of voting, I hereby retract "Reader". I only proposed it yesterday and would need to consider it my #1, and make a case against the others. > > But seeing David Chadwick's explanation for "Relying Party", which I accept, I now prefer that term. > > I suggest ignoring "Reader" in the considerations and voting unless someone else decides to champion it with new reasoning. > > Steven > > >> 2. If you propose something, make an argument for the use of that term >> and an argument against all of the other terms. >> 3. Don't send "me too" emails. If you want to weigh in, please make >> sure you're making an argument that no one else has made in order to >> cut down on the number of emails sent to the mailing list. >> >> We are going to collect input until midnight on Thursday and put up two >> Generalized Instant Runoff Voting[1] polls on Friday. The polls will be >> open for a week and will determine the final terminology we'll use >> across all of the documents. >> >> -- manu >> >> [1]https://www.opavote.com/methods#instant-runoff-voting >> >
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 22:15:05 UTC