On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 02/16/2016 11:13 AM, Shane McCarron wrote: > > I don't think there's a conflict. I suppose you can try updating the use > cases to see how it goes, but I think you should wait to do that until > after the F2F. The top priority is just making sure the use cases are in > good shape; a terminology change can happen later -- and it may affect > other presentation materials that we don't want to get out of sync at > the last minute. > I will do any updates in a branch - I agree that we are under the gun right now for next week. Although I don't know that the use cases are completely relevant in that meeting. Supporting document - not primary deliverable. Manu? -Shane
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2016 18:28:58 UTC