Re: Revised Verifiable Claims WG Charter (RC-2) (was Re: Problem statement)

FWIW I interpret privacy-enhancing as the ability for holders and subjects
of a claim to limit the verifiable exposure of information from the claim
to specific processors and for specific periods of time.  Or something to
that effect.

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 3:57 PM, David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Hi Manu
>
> A couple of comments on the latest version
>
> i) The first sentence could be formulated more precisely, as
> self-sovereign refers to credentials and not to standards. Similar
> comment applies tor privacy-enhancing. Therefore the following is more
> correct:
>
> There is currently no standard for expressing and transacting
> self-sovereign and privacy-enhancing verifiable claims (aka:
> credentials, attestations) via the Web.
>
> ii) in 3.1 you ought to define what you mean by privacy-enhancing
> (regardless of the resolution of i) above). You have already defined
> self-sovereign
>
> regards
>
> David
>
>
>
> On 06/08/2016 17:47, Manu Sporny wrote:
> > On 08/02/2016 12:24 PM, David Chadwick wrote:
> >> How about changing the first sentence of the problem statement
> >
> > Based on Wendy Seltzer and Microsoft's feedback, as well as the
> > resulting feedback from the VCTF and CCG, the charter text has been
> > changed to reflect the consensus we have built as well as address the
> > concerns raised to date. Remember that we're not looking for the perfect
> > charter, but one that all of us can live with.
> >
> > The new charter can be found here:
> >
> > http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/charter/rc-2.html
> >
> > with a diff-marked copy here:
> >
> > http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/charter/rc-2-diff.html
> >
> > I suggest you look at the latter link if you're only interested in the
> > changes from the previous draft charter.
> >
> > -- manu
> >
>
>


-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops