Re: Revised Verifiable Claims WG Charter (RC-2) (was Re: Problem statement)

Hi Manu

A couple of comments on the latest version

i) The first sentence could be formulated more precisely, as
self-sovereign refers to credentials and not to standards. Similar
comment applies tor privacy-enhancing. Therefore the following is more

There is currently no standard for expressing and transacting
self-sovereign and privacy-enhancing verifiable claims (aka:
credentials, attestations) via the Web.

ii) in 3.1 you ought to define what you mean by privacy-enhancing
(regardless of the resolution of i) above). You have already defined



On 06/08/2016 17:47, Manu Sporny wrote:
> On 08/02/2016 12:24 PM, David Chadwick wrote:
>> How about changing the first sentence of the problem statement
> Based on Wendy Seltzer and Microsoft's feedback, as well as the
> resulting feedback from the VCTF and CCG, the charter text has been
> changed to reflect the consensus we have built as well as address the
> concerns raised to date. Remember that we're not looking for the perfect
> charter, but one that all of us can live with.
> The new charter can be found here:
> with a diff-marked copy here:
> I suggest you look at the latter link if you're only interested in the
> changes from the previous draft charter.
> -- manu

Received on Sunday, 7 August 2016 21:01:21 UTC