- From: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 21:57:57 +0100
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
Hi Manu A couple of comments on the latest version i) The first sentence could be formulated more precisely, as self-sovereign refers to credentials and not to standards. Similar comment applies tor privacy-enhancing. Therefore the following is more correct: There is currently no standard for expressing and transacting self-sovereign and privacy-enhancing verifiable claims (aka: credentials, attestations) via the Web. ii) in 3.1 you ought to define what you mean by privacy-enhancing (regardless of the resolution of i) above). You have already defined self-sovereign regards David On 06/08/2016 17:47, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 08/02/2016 12:24 PM, David Chadwick wrote: >> How about changing the first sentence of the problem statement > > Based on Wendy Seltzer and Microsoft's feedback, as well as the > resulting feedback from the VCTF and CCG, the charter text has been > changed to reflect the consensus we have built as well as address the > concerns raised to date. Remember that we're not looking for the perfect > charter, but one that all of us can live with. > > The new charter can be found here: > > http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/charter/rc-2.html > > with a diff-marked copy here: > > http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/charter/rc-2-diff.html > > I suggest you look at the latter link if you're only interested in the > changes from the previous draft charter. > > -- manu >
Received on Sunday, 7 August 2016 21:01:21 UTC