- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:34:07 +0200
- To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+eFz_KtnN6q15Fb7j0S4a5dQo8=BGxwfMHNq5-ST85Mr_Kcrg@mail.gmail.com>
Congratulations to all involved. Publishing a standard is one thing, widespread adoption by someone like Google is another. WRT the clear signatures, I would suggest that we ignore the back-and-forth between the various people from W3C and IETF groups regarding JOSE vs clear sigs etc. If we focus on getting the clear sig spec to a level of maturity close to JSON-LD (congrats on the recent publication in that regard) adoption of clear signatures will surely be a natural progression from wide adoption of JSON-LD. On 16 January 2015 at 07:10, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > Congrats Manu & Digital Bazaar! You've earned it! > > The only remaining issue (IMO) is how to provide signed credentials. > > JOSE-JWS hides the information from search engines which I think will have > a negative effect. > Although I'm obviously biased I believe that a "plain" JSON clear text > signature scheme would > have the best chance getting traction. > > Anders > https://mobilepki.org/jcs > > > > On 2015-01-16 05:05, Manu Sporny wrote: > >> Google just announced that it's taking the next step toward deeper >> JSON-LD integration across all their search products. >> >> "Google is in the process of adding JSON-LD support to more >> markup-powered features. So far, JSON-LD is supported for all Knowledge >> Graph features, sitelink search boxes, and Event Rich Snippets; Google >> recommends the use of JSON-LD for those features." >> >> "Also, Google can read JSON-LD data even when it is dynamically injected >> into the page's contents, such as by Javascript code or embedded >> 'widgets'." >> >> https://developers.google.com/webmasters/structured-data/schema-org >> >> So, I think most of you know where I'm headed with this. >> >> The sooner we get the Credentials/OBI vocabulary integrated into >> schema.org the better. There's an entire industry (talent scouting / >> recruiting) that would love to be able to scan your resume in a >> machine-readable / verifiable way. The hard work is done - Google's >> Schema.org is now reading JSON-LD from all web pages. The easier part is >> going to be pushing the vocabulary into schema.org. It's not guaranteed >> to succeed, but if it does, we'll have a badges/credentials vocabulary >> that Google/Yandex/Yahoo/and Microsoft understands. >> >> Google ["What skills does John Smith possess?"] [Search] >> >> -- manu >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 18:34:35 UTC