- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:22:15 -0500
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 01/19/2015 01:34 PM, Adrian Hope-Bailie wrote: > WRT the clear signatures, I would suggest that we ignore the > back-and-forth between the various people from W3C and IETF groups > regarding JOSE vs clear sigs etc. If we focus on getting the clear > sig spec to a level of maturity close to JSON-LD (congrats on the > recent publication in that regard) adoption of clear signatures will > surely be a natural progression from wide adoption of JSON-LD. +1, sounds like a solid strategy to me. Here's a link to the current spec (recently split out of the Secure Messaging spec): https://web-payments.org/specs/source/ld-signatures/ and an implementation of the technology in node.js Javascript (and browser-side JS coming soon-ish): https://github.com/digitalbazaar/jsonld-signatures -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 04:22:39 UTC