- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 06:10:29 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Congrats Manu & Digital Bazaar! You've earned it! The only remaining issue (IMO) is how to provide signed credentials. JOSE-JWS hides the information from search engines which I think will have a negative effect. Although I'm obviously biased I believe that a "plain" JSON clear text signature scheme would have the best chance getting traction. Anders https://mobilepki.org/jcs On 2015-01-16 05:05, Manu Sporny wrote: > Google just announced that it's taking the next step toward deeper > JSON-LD integration across all their search products. > > "Google is in the process of adding JSON-LD support to more > markup-powered features. So far, JSON-LD is supported for all Knowledge > Graph features, sitelink search boxes, and Event Rich Snippets; Google > recommends the use of JSON-LD for those features." > > "Also, Google can read JSON-LD data even when it is dynamically injected > into the page's contents, such as by Javascript code or embedded 'widgets'." > > https://developers.google.com/webmasters/structured-data/schema-org > > So, I think most of you know where I'm headed with this. > > The sooner we get the Credentials/OBI vocabulary integrated into > schema.org the better. There's an entire industry (talent scouting / > recruiting) that would love to be able to scan your resume in a > machine-readable / verifiable way. The hard work is done - Google's > Schema.org is now reading JSON-LD from all web pages. The easier part is > going to be pushing the vocabulary into schema.org. It's not guaranteed > to succeed, but if it does, we'll have a badges/credentials vocabulary > that Google/Yandex/Yahoo/and Microsoft understands. > > Google ["What skills does John Smith possess?"] [Search] > > -- manu >
Received on Friday, 16 January 2015 05:11:10 UTC