- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:49:26 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 2014-10-03 23:29, Manu Sporny wrote: > We finally got around to porting the history[1] over for the Identity > Credentials specification today, so the opencreds.org website finally > has a specifications page: > > http://opencreds.org/specs/ If I got it correctly, Identity Credentials' WAYF (Where Are You From) mechanism is based on a distributed system (TeleHash) which I haven't seen anywhere else in the identity space, have you? I must confess that I have big difficulties understanding the full set of pros and cons of using TeleHash as a foundation. IMO it is a pity that Mozilla et. al. clings on to software and architectures that are almost 20 years old (NSS), since an obvious (=simple) solution would be keeping WAYF-information inside of a locally provisioned and accessed token like already was the case with Microsoft's brilliant [but unfortunately failed] Information Card scheme. Microsoft essentially have the same problem as Mozilla, a severely dated platform with respect to token handling which made Information Cards an "alien bird" instead of an integral part of the credentialing system. Information Cards had no private keys...Oops Yes, I know we can't change browsers but I'm not convinced that putting a lot of effort on workarounds is the right approach either, at least not in standards context. The real problem is rather that a lot of IC-like schemes [probably] need the same thing but for historic reasons, slightly overblown egos and a general lack of foresight, the critical mass for a unified solution seems to be outside of what can be achieved through a standards process unless we are talking about standardization of something which is already firmly established like it was for XHR. Anyway, I'm fairly convinced that the Information Card principle eventually will be resurrected (in some way...) because it is simple and extensible[*], it only needs a [much] better platform! Anders *] This is a problematic point because there is no established/accepted model for "trusted web applications" except for features like geo-location which IMO is something entirely different than for example payment credentials which I think the WebCrypto.Next folks will soon find out :-) > > -- manu > > [1] > https://github.com/opencreds/website/commits/master/specs/source/identity-credentials/index.html >
Received on Saturday, 4 October 2014 08:49:56 UTC