- From: David I. Lehn <dil@lehn.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:34:04 -0500
- To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2014-12-02 19:09, Richard Barnes wrote: >> >> Human-readability is only a very minor part of the objectives here. >> Base64 deserialization is not a major issue. > > > This departs from the thoughts behind JSON's predecessor, XML. > > Anyway, I'm sure many other organizations will use JSON clear-text > signatures > (home-brewed though since there is no such standard), particularly since it > has > been found out to be compliant with at least the browser parsers. That this > is the case has a trivial explanation: > > Only a bad programmer would design a parser so it would output data > in a different order than it was supplied in, even if the "standard" > allowed that. > You've mentioned something like this a few times. Can you clarify or give a link to details on what context this is in, what platforms you are targeting, what data you are dealing with, and what algorithms you are performing on that data? -dave
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:34:31 UTC