Re: Incorrect use ordered list for criteria in 3.3.4 AND 3.3.6

George,

We agree that this list should be a bulleted list, but as it is written this way in the WCAG 2.0 recommendation and we are not changing the content of WCAG itself at this time it makes sense to leave the understanding document in alignment with it. 

Thanks for the comment, you are right, but the most we can do at this time is add this to our list of errata. 


Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe 

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk

http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility








On 1/19/16, 17:00, "noreply@w3.org" <noreply@w3.org> wrote:

>Name: George Joeckel
>Email: george@webaim.org
>Affiliation: WebAIM
>Document: UW
>Item Number: Understanding Guideline 3.3 
>Part of Item: Intent
>Comment Type: editorial
>Summary of Issue: Incorrect use ordered list for criteria in 3.3.4 AND 3.3.6
>Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
>These lists are for items where "at least one of the following is true". There is no sequence related to these items. 
>
>References: 
>- See Technique H48: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H48.html

>-See 2.2.1, where a list of criteria to select from is presented as an unordered list: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#time-limits

>
>Proposed Change:
>Change criteria lists in 3.3.4 and 3.3.6 to unordered lists.
>
>Consider adding the "; or" format used at the end of list items in 2.2.1 to reinforce the "at least one of the following is true" requirement.
>

Received on Saturday, 6 February 2016 13:57:31 UTC