W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > February 2016

Re: Incorrect use of ordered list for items in 1.4.8

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 13:56:28 +0000
To: "george@webaim.org" <george@webaim.org>, "public-comments-wcag20@w3.org" <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F6B20A9F-8096-4AE3-B0E9-417D78C8BFD0@adobe.com>
George,

We agree that this list should be a bulleted list, but as it is written this way in the WCAG 2.0 recommendation and we are not changing the content of WCAG itself at this time it makes sense to leave the understanding document in alignment with it. 

Thanks for the comment, you are right, but the most we can do at this time is add this to our list of errata. 

Thanks,

AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe 

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk

http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility








On 1/19/16, 17:01, "noreply@w3.org" <noreply@w3.org> wrote:

>Name: George Joeckel
>Email: george@webaim.org
>Affiliation: WebAIM
>Document: UW
>Item Number: Understanding Guideline 1.4 
>Part of Item: Intent
>Comment Type: editorial
>Summary of Issue: Incorrect use of ordered list for items in 1.4.8
>Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
>Unless the items listed in 1.4.8 must be reviewed in the sequence presented, this list should be unordered.
>
>Reference: - See Technique H48: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H48.html

>
>Proposed Change:
>Review 1.4.8 and determine if the items listed must be checked for conformance in the sequence presented.
>
>If that sequence is not required, change to an unordered list. 
>
Received on Saturday, 6 February 2016 13:57:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 6 February 2016 13:57:02 UTC