- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:20:43 -0500
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org, wai@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAH2ngER33vp5Z4sw-4JQbQBors3yus47CrhgX6gqsgCK-70F2g@mail.gmail.com>
Dear WAI, I need clarification on 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks. Can you tell me if my interpretation is correct: I think it is possible to pass WCAG 2.0 SC 2.4.1 by doing ONE of the following: 1. Creating links to skip blocks of repeated materials. OR 2. Grouping blocks of repeated material in a way that can be skipped. In other words, I think you can pick a single technique from either of these options and pass 2.4.1. For example: *If Site "A" met "G1*: Adding a link at the top of each page that goes directly to the main content area" , *it would pass 2.4.1 *(even if Site A did not employ anything that address "grouping blocks of repeated material in a way that can be skipped". *OR* *If Site "B" met "H69: * Providing heading elements at the beginning of each section of content", *it would pass 2.4.1* (even if Site B did not employe anything that addresses "creating links to skip blocks of repeated materials". I know this is a very narrow interpretation of WCAG 2.0 SC 2.4.1, and with all my heart I recommend it is a best practice to employ both headings and skip links, but the question at hand is...do I "fail" a site on WCAG 2.0 SC 2.4.1 if it doesn't have sufficient techniques for both "creating links to skip blocks of repeated materials" and "grouping blocks of repeated material in a way that can be skipped"? Thanks in advance for your insight (as you might guess, the Deque Accessibility Experts are not in agreement in how to interpret this). Best, Glenda -- glenda sims | deque.com | 512.963.3773 *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 01:21:10 UTC